I’ve purposely waited a bit to post this, as I didn’t want people to think I was posting to benefit from adding keywords surrounding recent events to improve search rankings (like Mashable did). It’s taken from a Google+ post I put up a few days ago.
So, is it going to be the death of a celebrity, a catastrophic event or the airing of a popular tv show that spells the end of Twitter?
I really love Twitter. To be honest though, whenever one of the three types of events above occurs, I turn my back on it until everyone gets off their soapbox.
Facebook is the same. Status updates like “Who gives a f*ck about some crackhead when so many people are suffering in Norway” make me want to just delete my account altogether. The other side of the fence is just as annoying, “This is the worst thing to happen to music since the death of John Lennon”. Oh please. It’s devastating, but Lennon changed the shape of pop and rock music as part of the most influential band the world has ever seen.
Currently there is no way of customising your Google+ profile link within Google+. This video shows how you can create a custom link (e.g. http://gplus.to/onlineastevens) as to opposed to having to use the long link that Google+ provides you with (e.g. https://plus.google.com/106408017039367948755).
I want to get a couple of things straight before I start singing the praises of Google Plus. First of all, I LOVE Twitter. Absolutely love it. Secondly, I live with Facebook because it is the easiest way to keep up with people I know that are scattered all over the place. For me, Twitter is like eating cake; something I do regularly because I really enjoy it. Facebook is like ironing clothes, something I feel compelled to do to keep up appearances.
So now I’ve set the scene, here is an outline of the feature I like most about Google plus. Read the rest of this entry
Did you know that if you begin a tweet with someone’s Twitter handle (their Twitter name, e.g. @OnlineAStevens), then only people who are following both you AND the account that you have mentioned will see that tweet?
Following on from my Facebook fatigue or just lazy journalism article comes news from Online Social Media, who also source Mashable and TechCrunch, that Facebook and Skype will work together to provide an in-browser video chat platform.
This, I believe, is awesome news. It’s great because you will be able to video chat with friends and family easily through the social networking tool that you use most regularly to keep in touch with them. Brilliant! I would call it Faceypook. They will probably not call it Faceypook.
Those benefits (and my proposed working title for the project) to one side, lets discuss one of the main objectives of university careers offices – getting students and graduates in front of employers. I’m not talking about your established graduate recruiters, but the masses of other opportunity providers out there. The majority of these providers have Facebook pages and more or less every student has a Facebook account, and despite the great work so far in linking the two through university Facebook pages, the benefits are there for all to see but could be much higher. There is a great opportunity for careers services to facilitate these online conversations.
In its current state, it is difficult to take advantage of Facebook’s massive reach within the student community in relation to careers advice and opportunities. In the eyes of most students, Facebook is for friends, photos, family, etc, not for finding employment. Careers service Facebook pages are gaining more interest, Salford University are doing some great work and reaping the benefits, but often pages are used as a referral mechanism to events or information outside the remit of Facebook. How great will it be then when (although it is tbc) Skype video chat through Facebook becomes a reality? It will, I believe, be the catalyst for students to use video in their job search and become more aware of the need for a professionally maintained online presence.
Careers service Facebook pages will become meeting points for job seeking students/graduates and potential employers – facilitating video interviews between the two. As a recruiter, I’d pay for that service – to chat directly to job seekers. I imagine that Skype’s group calling functionality will be implemented at some point, thus enabling calls to be moderated if required. What a great opportunity for organisations to tap into a fantastic recruitment market and for students to ‘meet’ employers and hone their interview technique!
Lets leave the ‘video can be used to discriminate’ chat at the door for this one. My stance on this issue is that if an employer is stupid enough to let the age, race, gender or a disability affect their recruitment decisions in a video interview, by excluding the video interview process you simply postpone their discrimination until the face-to-face interview. The opportunities that come with being able to tap into the world’s biggest social network outweigh the potential negatives brought about by “what if”s.
On a sidenote, if you hear a loud groan when the Skype/Facebook video chat service is released, that’ll be Google realising that Google+ is now even less likely to take off properly. Ah well Google, chin up, 4th time lucky eh?
Add your thoughts and comments on how this service could be rolled out or whether you think it’s a good idea or not, alternatively tweet thoughts to my account – @OnlineAStevens.
I meant to write a post in response to this Decline In Users Hints At ‘Facebook Fatigue’ article from Sky News, published on Yahoo on June 14th, sooner but I was on holiday. I had no data connection, so I did some real world things like being taken for my stag do (no doubt pictures soon to appear on Facebook) and taking the little fella to the beach, instead of having my face stuffed in my mobile.
The point I wanted to raise about this article, and similar knee-jerk ‘news’ content that gets spewed out, is that sections of the press seem to be constantly looking for an anti-Facebook story. Don’t get me wrong, Facebook doesn’t need me sticking up for it, and there are plenty of negative points that you could raise about them. But if you’re going to do this effectively, at least get the calculator out and apply some forethought before you start predicting the beginning of the end for the world’s leading social networking site.
The article is based on the fact that Facebook recently lost 100,000 UK accounts. This equates to only 0.3% of the 30m UK accounts in existance. I doubt that this minor drop off is keeping Mr Zuckerberg awake at night. I’m sure instead he will be thinking about the fact that, according to Checkfacebook.com, their 30m users equate to 67% of UK internet users. Also remember that this is account numbers we’re talking about. The 0.3% will be dead wood, accounts that are not being used. The other 99.7% of UK accounts are using Facebook as their main platform to share content they have created themselves and content they come across online.
Here are some other Facebook facts that indicate that the world is some way from suffering from a severe case of ‘Facebook fatigue’:
- Facebook has over 500 million active (and active is the key word here) users worldwide, Facebook.com
- 30 billion pieces of content are shared through Facebook each month, Facebook.com
- 1 out of every 6 pages views in the UK are attributed to Facebook – twice the number of Google, Experian Hitwise
There will be a saturation point at which growth slows to a stop, but they have prolonged their life span by embedding themselves on near enough every website with like/share buttons – 250 million people engage with Facebook every month on external websites. They’ll be ok for a while yet. With this article, could it be that Sky and Mr Murdoch were trying to avert people’s attention from the fact that he had to sell ‘social networking fall from grace case study’ MySpace for 10% of what he paid for it this week?
Facebook will continue to grow in 2011 and I personally think that their next step will be into the online voucher market, to counter the proposed merger between online coupon provider Groupon and location-based social networking site Foursquare. I also think they will look to improve their photo and video upload service within the next year, as the existing interface leaves a lot to be desired.
Have you found yourself using Facebook less recently, or do you even use it at all? Add comments below or tweet to @OnlineAStevens.
First of all, apologies to those that usually visit my blog for careers or social media related posts, but I’ve had an idea that I would like to share. It is kind of relevant, as it features the same functionality as the Augmented Reality Uni Apps that we have created at Prospects – the first of which, York St John University, is now available for download from iTunes.
First of all some background. In its simplest terms, augmented reality (AR) involves super-imposing information on top of a view as seen through a camera linked to a computer or mobile device. Mobile AR gaming involves super-imposing a game over the top of the view as seen through the camera of your mobile device. A simple example of this is a game called Mosquitoes and there is a Star Wars Tie Fighter mobile AR game, which looks amazing when being played whilst looking out over New York City. Whether you’re sat in your living room or looking out over a park, as long as you have a device with an accelerometer and a camera you can play mobile AR games that are superimposed over your view. In layman’s terms the equipment you will need is an iPhone 3GS or better, or a smartphone made within the last couple of years.
I believe that this technology could offer a fantastic opportunity for the world of sports. Prior to a game or sporting event commencing the crowd, using the actual playing field, could play the sport they are about to watch – each being able to say afterwards that they had played at Wembley, ran the 100m in the London Olympics or converted a penalty kick at Twickenham (see mock-up below – excuse shabby Photoshopping). The interest around the sport in question as a result of this sort of app would be massive, with potential to create video content of the games being played and videos taken of a stand full of people all glued to their mobile devices. These ‘crowd in unison’ videos have worked well in recent T-Mobile campaigns.
To inspire additional uptake, fans that could not make it to the stadium would also be able to play in-browser from their home computer. The game would simply be transposed onto a video feed of the field of play. This opens up the potential for a match-making scenario similar to xBox Live or the Playstation Network (minus the security leaks) and would provide heaps of exposure for that sport.
Additional functionality should also include:
- Option to download the AR game app via QR codes on tickets and in-stadium banners
- Additional advertising opportunities for sponsors, who could brand loading pages and super-impose their adverts onto the field of play
- Match-making against opposing fans
- Prizes for top performers (e.g. tickets for top scorer of the season, chance to meet players/athletes)
- Users can share their result via social media platforms
- Function to record screen activity to share via a hall of fame and social media channels, as well as creating a memento of stadium experience
- Disabling the AR game once sport event commences
Whether or not this could be turned around in time for London 2012, I don’t know. But if you were able to play an AR version of Track & Field, then surely you’d take it right?
There is a great blog post from Scott Anthony regarding the slow uptake of AR. I feel that the mass exposure that the world of sports offers would thrust AR into the spotlight. Add your comments, I would love to hear thoughts.
May 2011 stats from eMarketer identify that this year 47% of US internet users (88.2 million) were online coupon users in 2010, and this figure is set to rise by 8.5m by 2013. The UK figures aren’t as huge yet, but bear in mind that 50% of Groupon users are based in the US where the organisation started out, but the top 5 UK online coupon sites had 7.83m unique users in April 2011 (source: comScore, article by Marketing Week – for the record, I don’t agree that LivingSocial will overtake Groupon. Groupon’s exponential growth over the coming months will dwarf LivingSocial’s).
Marketing managers are more accountable than ever for the performance of every pound of their budgets and the trackable nature of online coupons, mixed with the success of sites such as Groupon, provide a marketing tool that is difficult to ignore. Especially considering the proposed partnership between Groupon and Foursquare combining location-based services, one of the areas to watch in 2011, with the success of online coupons.
There is a problem though. When organisations or institutions see these performance figures there is the risk of jumping on the bandwagon without thinking things through. If you have read any of my other articles or seen my presentations, you will know that I like people to ask themselves questions. More specifically, the right questions. In relation to online coupons, don’t ask yourself “How do I get involved with Groupon? Everyone seems to be using it at the minute”. Rather, ask yourself the following (other online coupon sites are available, but I write the following in reference to Groupon):
- “Does Groupon provide a cost-effective channel for my product or service?”. Will you be offering your product/service at a loss? This is fine if it results in long-term customer relationships, but be aware that many coupon users will be one-time only users of your business.
- “If it does, how can I differentiate my offering from all of the other companies using Groupon?”
- “How can I integrate my Groupon campaign with other marketing and social media activity?”
- “Can we handle the influx of business that the vouchers will create and can we avoid negative customer experiences that will be detrimental to our brand?”. You could end up with hundreds of customers and failing to provide the usual level of service that you provide. The end result is a bunch of low-profit, brand damaging transactions because you can’t handle the load.
- “What is my strategy to ensure these coupon based transactions result in long-term, profitable and engaging relationships?”. At a basic level, this may be adding customers to your email list. If you want to get more creative, get people to check-in/tweet/update statuses/record and submit videos whilst using your product or service. Create a buzz around your brand whilst these interactions are taking place to really get the most out of each one.
My advice would be:
SMEs – think creatively about your online coupon offering and don’t consider your strategy in isolation. Think about how the coupons fit into your marketing plans and social media strategy. Support your plan with rich media content, such as a video showcasing the product/service on offer, and promote this content via every marketing channel at your disposal.
Universities – now more than ever you should be partnering with local businesses. They rely on trade from your students every year, your students are integral to their business model. Why not use this to your advantage? Use locally sourced promotions to increase student engagement at careers events and such (e.g. Receive 20% discount on food at Tiger Tiger when checking in at Sports Hall for careers fair).
Online coupons offer a great opportunity for consumers, businesses and universities. I hope that they receive proper consideration in the marketing planning process going forward. I would love to hear your thoughts and experiences with online coupons, as a consumer or a brand. Just add your comments.